Review Article
Recommendation of learning Pain website for pain physicians in clinical practice
Volume 29,Issue 1,Pages 27-37
Shaun-Ting Yeh1 , Chiu-Yin Lee2 , Wei-Han Chou3

1Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

2Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

3Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan Running title: Pain website Recommendation

#Equal contribution to this article.

PDF

Outline

Abstract

Background

Pain had been identified as a major health issue due to its high prevalence and management of these patients is one of the most important concerns of medical professionals. In the era of information, making good use of online resources have been showing increasing importance in taking care of patients and staying updated. However, barriers to internet usage still exist, including time, searching skills, and confusing information. For those medical professionals who assess the internet, many were showed to rely on general websites rather than readily accessible relevant information resources. A summary of relevant online resources is need to promote and improve professional data searching in the field of pain

Aims

To present reliable online resources in the field of pain for medical professionals.

Methods

Five senior anesthesiologists (all working in academic medical centers) with the certification of pain specialist recommend the websites.


Results

9 relevant websites in the field of pain are highlighted: World Institute of Pain(WIP), International Association for the Study of Pain(IASP), PainCast, The Trigger Point & Referred Pain Guide, IMAIOS e-Anatomy, Pain Medicine News, New York School of Regional Anesthesia(NYSORA), GlobalRPh- Opioid analgesic
converter, Advancing the Science of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine(USRA).


Discussion

he limitation of this special report makes checking updated papers and guidelines still needed while drawing online information for clinical usage to avoid violation of the principle of evidence-based-medicine.


Conclusion

These websites provide ambient online resources allowing
users to improve their knowledge, daily clinical practice, career planning, and interconnections with professionals worldwide.

Key Words

Pain physician; Web resource; Internet usage; Pain.



Download full text in PDF

References
1

Nahin RL.

Estimates of pain prevalence and severity in adults: United States, 2012.

J Pain. 2015;16(8):769-80

CrossRef

2

Fayaz A, Croft P, Langford RM, et al

Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies

BMJ Open 2016:6:e010364. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010364

CrossRef

3

de Souza JB, Grossmann E, Perissinotti DMN, de Oliveira Junior JO, da Fonseca PRB, Posso IP.

Prevalence of Chronic Pain, Treatments, Perception, and Interference on Life Activities: Brazilian Population-Based Survey.

Pain Res Manag. 2017

CrossRef

4

Kuehn B.

Chronic Pain Prevalence.

JAMA. 2018;320(16):1632. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16009

CrossRef

5

Moick M, Terlutter R.

Physicians’ motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior.

Med 20. 2012;1(2):e2

CrossRef

6

https://www.ipsos.com/en-ru/74-doctors-use-internet-professional-purposes

CrossRef

7

https://www.pm360online.com/examining-physician-use-of-social-media-in-2017/

CrossRef

8

Ronald E. Rice, James E. Katz

The Internet and Health Communication: Experiences and Expectations.

Sage publications Inc, 2001, p 108- 109

9

Younger, P.

Internet-based information- seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature.

Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27:2-10. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00883.x

CrossRef

10

Masters K.

For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: a systematic review.

Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(1):4-16

CrossRef PDF

11

Casebeer L, Bennett N, Kristofco R, Carillo A, Centor R.

Physician Internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns.

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22(1):33- 42

CrossRef

12

Kritz M, Gschwandtner M, Stefanov V, Hanbury A, Samwald M.

Utilization and perceived problems of online medical resources and search tools among different groups of European physicians.

J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e122

CrossRef

13

Hughes, B. , Wareham, J. and Joshi, I.

Doctors’ online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models.

J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.,61:433-452. doi: 10.1002/asi.21245

CrossRef